Sri Lanka has almost never voted for
people. Neither has it voted for parties. It has voted for people and parties. Strange,
yes, but true. People-factors are taken into account, and so are party-factors.
But voters rarely acknowledge one of them in isolation. People are elected on
the basis of their parties and parties are elected on the basis of their
members. That's the truth, that has been the truth, and I suspect that that
will be the truth. For a long time.
We're seeing a "phenomenon"
today. I don't think this phenomenon is enough to break into either of the two
main parties in the country. To put it simply, Mahinda Rajapaksa has a base,
yes. But you can't translate this into a "third force". It's not
possible. No former president (or prime minister) could do that here. Rajapaksa
won't be any different. He can’t cut into either major party. Period.
Still, his base shouldn't be forgotten.
For one thing, he has a stronghold in the South. It is true he won it
marginally this time, barring those electorates he won by a massive margin. The
SLFP and UPFA, let's not forget, couldn't come up with a proper successor to
the man. Part of the reason why they went against him was because he was
(unduly) using his party to boost his family, a point highlighted by many
grassroots SLFP'ers who (to put it colloquially) were "fed up" with
him. Doesn't and shouldn't mean he should be cast out. Not yet.
The man should not be absolved. He
committed and sanctioned abuse. Like all politicians, however, he knows
charisma and political mileage. He knows how to distill action from words, but
the problem with his last few years was that he relied more on words and less
on act. Winning wars are alright, indeed commendable. But Winston Churchill did
not create a quasi-dictatorship (or, as President Maithripala Sirisena put it
on November 21 2014, a "benevolent dictatorship"). He was elected
out. We remember postwar Britain not for Churchill's Old Conservatism but for Attlee's
New Socialism. It's that simple.
And yet, the war remains Rajapaksa's
biggest trump-card. Even now. It is heartening to see that he doesn't spew
nationalist rhetoric based on that today, although I am deeply disturbed by how
he and his cohort "remind" us that they won the election except for
the North and East. Defeat must be conceded. Harping about how one part of the
country made you lose isn't going to help. Next thing you know, his cohort will
be claiming that the country must be divided to ensure his victory! Yes, it's
that ironic. Ironic because Rajapaksa claims to be the one who unified this
country and got rid of terrorism.
The biggest tragedy, however, is that the
SLFP is looking at all this like a shell-shocked person. It doesn't know what
to do and isn't sure where it's going. Maithripala Sirisena is President, yes,
but he acts more like a figurehead with Ranil Wickremesinghe calling the shots.
Not surprising there, but the man must assert himself. Going by Wickremesinghe’s
recent remarks (including his "threat" to certain Sinhala language
newspapers allegedly whipping up racism), it would be better for President
Sirisena to make himself known, without talking so much about his predecessor's
abuses and how his regime is far better in comparison. Let's not forget that
even Rajapaksa was humble enough not to badmouth Chandrika Kumaratunga. I am,
of course, talking about his first few years in power after he succeeded her:
his and his party-faction’s take on the lady during this year's campaign was nothing
but despicable.
Bottom line, hence: Rajapaksa wants to
come back. My point is that he can't make a comeback. There are grievances he
must address and apologise for. There are concerns he must take note of should
he decide to stage a return. And most of all, there are problems with the
electoral system and Constitution that he must acknowledge. Without doing any
of this, I find it hard to believe that he will or he can return. The Mahinda
Factor, therefore, will be just a factor, to be taken in or thrown out at the
whims of those in power.
Rajapaksa was probably laughing behind the
cameras after he said, "I did not engage in vindictive politics while in
power". More statements like that and his opponents can most certainly win
against him. But then again, his own party doesn't seem to know what to do with
him. Sad and tragic, yes. Ironic, certainly.
Uditha Devapriya is a freelance writer who can be reached at udakdev1@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment