“Politically futile, socially
false, intellectually worthless, aesthetically valueless, and industrially
paralytic.” If all these words seem like contrived synonyms to you, then merely
convey the intensity of the man speaking them. Juan Bardem is considered one of
Spain’s most revered filmmakers: he was uncle to Javier Bardem, the half-crazed
murderer who won the Best Supporting Actor Oscar for No Country for Old Men.
The Bardems were also leftists: during Francisco Franco’s fascist regime they
were looked down on. And Juan Bardem, the most determined Spanish filmmaker of
his time, sought to change the decadent film industry of his country to a more
realistic strain.
He did this with a remarkable
film: Death of a Cyclist. It is a film that not only attacks the society
of his time: it is also a work that rallies against the filmmaking style of his
country. Here is a film whose main incident – an accident – is used to propel
its entire story from beginning to end. The incident at Bardem’s hands becomes
a means of projecting his own vision – of the upper class, the middle class
clambering onto the social ladder for success, and of illicit romance brought
about by class hierarchy. Here is a story where the ending – the lovers’
betrayal of one another – is told anti-climatically, with a suddenness that
shakes you, but with icy emotion.
Death of a Cyclist begins
with the accident straight away – no frilled beginnings, no slow set-ups. A
humble cyclist – whose identity is kept from us – collides with a car driven by
a University assistant lecturer with his girlfriend (who happens to be the wife
of a powerful patron of that University). To keep their affair a secret they
drive on, leaving the man to die. But their situation almost immediately
deteriorates: at a party an insignificant art critic called Rafael mentions the
word “blackmail” to the girl – so obliquely that she at once guesses the worst.
And she is right: in a tentative
sequence at a deserted art exhibition, the two of them exchange spiteful
remarks until the truth outs: he knows something about her and the lover, and –
in return for what we are never fully made aware of – he will keep quiet. But
he doesn’t: her husband is told something, and she herself does not hear what.
Only much later, after two-thirds of the story is done, do we get it that the
secret had nothing to do with the accident. By that time, the lover has had
enough disillusionment to last a lifetime: after a visit to the cyclist’s
neighbourhood and an encounter with University protestors, he resigns from his
lectureship and decides to confess to the Police. The woman, however, who with
Rafael’s failed attempt has grown complacent, refuses to accompany him, and, in
a shocking anti-climax, betrays him.
What marks out Death of a Cyclist from
the usual brand of political drama is, of course, Bardem’s vision: he does not
explicitly condemn the lovers, and indeed, he seems to reserve his most
stifling judgment on Rafael, the middle-class writer whose only obsession seems
to be clinging on the social ladder (“It’s fun observing you. I see your
sins, classify them, file them away, and wait... for the right moment to act,”
he tells the girl at the exhibition, “All the ugly things you hide, I dig up
and lay before you. It’s a means of purification”). Indeed this is what Bardem
criticizes the most: a society where conventions and dictates are fanatically
respected, where even the slightest deviation is condemned, exploited, and
trodden on.
It is understandable thus that Bardem was heavily censured by authorities at the time of its release: he
was forced to edit the original ending, where the girl escapes unpunished for
her crime, to suit a more “retributive” ending. Ironically the final image of
this ending – a humble cyclist who, having caused the girl’s death, heads to
get help from a nearby farm – explicitly juxtaposes with the beginning, where
the two lovers leave the old cyclist behind, mercilessly. The censure did not
end there: while making his next film, Calle Mayor, Bardem would be
imprisoned.
For its time, however, Death of a Cyclist was a landmark in Spanish
cinema: it would go onto win the coveted FIPRESCI Award at that year’s Cannes
Film Festival. With it, as ever, he sought to move the Spanish cinema from the
“politically futile” and “industrially paralytic” state it had been brought to
after the Civil War.
Written for: Ceylon Today ESCAPE, February 22 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment