NOTES ON AN ELECTION
Power struggles are rarely about people. Rhetoric is scripted in, yes, but for the most it remains a necessity as a means to an end. Outcomes which get preferred by parties never privilege the voter. This we know. As such election-aftermath has more to do with power and frill than it has with serving the people. This too we know.
Power struggles are rarely about people. Rhetoric is scripted in, yes, but for the most it remains a necessity as a means to an end. Outcomes which get preferred by parties never privilege the voter. This we know. As such election-aftermath has more to do with power and frill than it has with serving the people. This too we know.
Writing 12 days before Maithripala Sirisena defected from the
SLFP and thereby wrecked the political equation, Udaya Gammanpila, then allied
with the Jathika Hela Urumaya, commented on Ranil Wickremesinghe’s moves.
Arguing that Wickremesinghe would use a proxy, Gammanpila made a classic
inference: that he would use this move to retain position within his party.
This is true. Ranil Wickremesinghe’s conduct during the
presidential and parliamentary elections was suave to say the least. He aced
dissidents within his own party and that in a way which lent credibility to his
faction. If at all, he convinced those within the United National Party (UNP)
to join him, and thus privilege party above anything else.
Political equations do not last long, however. Scripted into
MOUs and agreements (between and within parties) are escape clauses. True,
Ranil’s grip on party leadership and his ability to wield power in the face of
popular dissent is not unknown. If at all, this will sustain his vision for party
and government for quite some time.
But this is just half the picture.
Dayan Jayatilleka once observed that the only way to salvage
the UNP was to join up with the JVP and other dissident parties and embark on a
consciousness-raising exercise against Mahinda Rajapaksa. What unfolded later wasn’t just a consciousness-raiser but a revolt against incumbent. Both Jayatilleka and
Gammanpila couldn’t have predicted Wickremesinghe using a stalwart from the
ruling party to become prime minister, which explains why both opposed Sirisena’s
campaign, the former on principal.
What happened next was the formation of four different
voter-camps, all of whom supported Sirisena. They were those who: 1. Supported the
UNP; 2. Embraced him from the UPFA; 3. Let go of ideology and supported him (from the JVP, TNA etc);
and 4. Were courted by the Jathika Hela Urumaya upon its ejection from the
Alliance and hence congealed into the floating voter.
The point is that Wickremesinghe’s equation is shaky. Those
four classes remain intact, but altered slightly. Now those with the UNP will
remain with the UNP. Those who supported Maithripala Sirisena from the UPFA are
with the president. But the other two classes, particularly those from the
floating vote-base, are what count. Wickremesinghe’s position should be based
or rather positioned on this ground. Why?
First of all, what’s national in this National Government?
What we’ve seen is a coalition, yes, but one in which the UNP dominates.
Power-sharing has been for the most vertical, with state largesse remaining with
the Greens and “titbit” ministries going to the Blues. In this context it’s not
too hard for the prime minister to court popularity within his party.
Problem is, these things don’t remain constant forever.
Wickremesinghe’s strategy was and is to split the SLFP and this in a way which
ensures that his faction within the UNP holds sway on government and party. He
needs to do two things here: a successor who’ll continue his legacy, and ensure
that his party “gets” the presidency some day. Whether he can do this while accommodating
those who’ve been known to oppose him within the UNP is for another article.
Right now, here’s what counts. Without delivering on the
mandate given to him by the floating voter, Wickremesinghe’s government can
hope for very little. This is not just because the UPFAers who affirm(ed) the
National Government are led by a party-less drive to weed out corruption and adjust
structural flaws. This is also because their representatives wrecked one
political equation, turning Rajapaksa into a lost cause. History, as we know,
can and does repeat itself.
Maduluwawe Sobitha Thero is not Green. Nor is Patali
Champika Ranawaka and the JHU, as well as those who helped the yahapalana campaign, Shiral Lakthilaka
included. They are as colourless as they can get. As such the primary need to
contain opposition and lend credence to a Green government means that two
requirements need to be met: national security and foreign affairs.
Here’s why.
Part of the reason why the UNP lacks support from the rural
voter is that it’s perceived as anti-poor and pro-West. This doesn’t make the
SLFP a socialist paradise either, but the point is that for almost 10 years,
ever since Rajapaksa breached the famous Maithri-Malik deal by allowing defectors to join his government, the UNP was badmouthed as a party which stood
against the war. Making matters worse was its tilt towards the West, even when
geopolitical realities recommended otherwise.
Here’s the pincer: the floating voter supported Sirisena to
drive out Rajapaksa for a reason. That had less to do with a rejection of
everything Rajapaksa stood for than a need to get his corrupt group out of the
way. The former president, let’s not forget, still courts popularity, and from
some of his own critics, for the way he handled the war. Those who claim that
other factors helped him are hence at a loss for words when asked, “Would these
factors have helped without him?”
Logically therefore, two things should remain constant
should a Rajapaksa Restoration NOT be legitimised: the country’s security
apparatus and its foreign relations, the latter of which should remain as neutral
and non-aligned as possible.
In an interview with foreign correspondent Padma Rao Sundarji
(for her book Sri Lanka: A New
Country), Sirisena emphatically stated that national security would remain a
priority, while the armed forces would gradually exit civil administration.
Sirisena’s statement affirms the view that what Rajapaksa left behind must be
held together and that in a way which ensures the opposition cannot justify his
predecessor’s return to power. The same, by the way, can be said of the country’s
foreign relations.
As things stand, the UNP has much to gain. Even from the
SLFP. Having gained power in a way which would have made Machiavelli proud,
Wickremesinghe must now ensure that what he got cannot be squandered. At all.
For that, he must satisfy those two requirements without letting go of the
broader canvas which he and his party seeks to enforce in this country,
economically, socially, and politically. If he’s successful in this, there’s no
doubt that the political equation will “stay”, indeed for quite some time.
Written for: The Nation INSIGHT, August 29 2015
Written for: The Nation INSIGHT, August 29 2015
No comments:
Post a Comment