Dr Dayan Jayatilleka in his article "The Rising:
Nugegoda Feb 18th"
makes two points clear. Firstly, Mahinda Rajapaksa is wanted. Secondly, those
who want him do not resent President Maithripala Sirisena: they just want the
SLFP to get the UNP out. While the first point is debatable, I agree with the
second.
President Sirisena's campaign was for good
governance. Even his rivals support this. Vasudeva Nanayakkara is reported to
have said that he would support it even if it takes more than 100 days. That's
commendable. The problem is that while those who support Rajapaksa support
Sirisena's program, the Sirisena faction is purposely leaving out Rajapaksa.
Which is where its problems begin to crop up.
The SLFP can't possibly hope to win with
the 6.2 million people who voted for Sirisena. Let's not forget that those 6.2
million included supporters (diehard or otherwise) of the UNP, JHU, SLMC, and
TNA. It's difficult to imagine that they will vote for him again. Briefly put,
the SLFP was split during the election. Even those who hated Rajapaksa voted
for him, particularly since they were unsure whether Sirisena remained in his
party. Those who voted for Sirisena thinking that he did remain were in the
minority among that 6.2 million, clearly.
Things are different today. What we are
seeing is a coalition of two parties balancing out each other. The UNP has the
government, while the party with the numbers in parliament has been
marginalised in the opposition. Going by the way it's handling this situation
(including that pathetic attempt at a no-confidence motion), the SLFP needs to
re-fire. Fast.
First of all, it must stick to its
promises. Mahinda Rajapaksa clearly failed to deliver the goods when it came to
democracy. But so did his predecessors. Sirisena is his successor. Who's to say
he will keep what he promised? If he chooses to go back on his mandate he's
cheating 6.2 million voters. If we are to apply this to those who voted for his
rival (given that even they support his program) he will be cheating another
5.7 million. He can't afford to slip up. Not now.
At the same time, he must maintain an edge
over the UNP. It's not difficult to do this. In spite of Chandrika Bandaranaike
Kumaratunge's claim that she won 75% of the war, no one in the SLFP has
discounted Rajapaksa's war victory. Just as the SLFP can claim that it won the
war, it can also claim to have changed the Constitution. Two achievements in
one go. Enviable.
Currently, however, the party doesn't know
which leader to support. Sirisena is its head in name, true, but even those who
support him defend Rajapaksa. The SLFP can't really be schizoid at this
point. Unfortunately, we have one section of the UPFA which campaigns for the
president and another section (even within the SLFP) which opposes him.
I have written earlier that the likes of
Rajitha Senaratne will not be enough to salvage the SLFP. I still stand by
this. As Dr Jayatilleka argues in his article, the Nugegoda rally was not a
threat but a message. It showed just how strong the former president still is.
And as Malinda
Seneviratne notes, he
has almost completely recovered his 2009 "face". He's positioned in a
way that the SLFP can be united. For good. That's an opportunity no one can
really refuse.
Given this, the SLFP can't afford a rift.
Those who marginalise the former president thinking that the party can
"win" the 5.7 million votes he got are politically schizoid.
Vilifying those who organised the Nugegoda rally won't help, hence.
Disregarding their message will do enough and more damage to the SLFP. At this
stage, no one wants that. At all.
Lakshman Kiriella got it right when he
said that a divided SLFP would ensure a UNP rule for the next 15 years. That's
being politically shrewd. And frank.
Uditha Devapriya is a freelance writer who can be reached at udakdev1@gmail.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment