There comes a
time when we must assess ourselves. This is a time for quiet reflection and not
nostalgia. This is a time when we must measure our faults against our greater
instincts. When we must try to find out where we’ve gone wrong and try to
remedy them. We are human, or dare I say we have been identified with the
“human” label. Whether a person acquires an identity through tags is of course another
debate altogether, but the point is this: unless we decide to get rid of our
baser instincts and try to embrace the true, unfettered meaning of that word
“human”, we cannot hope to go forward.
Sometimes,
though, there are one or two incidents which, if we look at their bigger
picture, may well drive every human being to shame. No, I’m not talking about
wars here. I’m talking about an old woman. She lives in Piliyandala. “Lives” of
course presupposes many things to do with life and amenities needed to maintain
it, but for the sake of argument let’s be content with that. Her name is
Nandani. Don’t ask me what school she went to, what kind of childhood she had,
or anything else related to her personal life. She’s a human being, like you
and me. If we prick her, she will bleed, as will most of us.
I’m here to talk
about something else. Nandani, like most of us I suppose, lives in a house.
Correction: a shelter, as in a shelter for dogs. All 20 of them. There are also
some cats. They outnumber the dogs. Now cats and dogs have to live as well.
They need to eat, to drink; they need space to stretch themselves. That’s what
they do. Problem is, Nandani has to fend for them, all by herself. She can’t.
At the rate she’s going, I doubt whether she can sustain what she’s doing any
longer.
Nandani wasn’t
always like this. Like most of us, she would have come from a modest
background. As I talk with her about this, she points at some ramshackle pieces
of furniture scattered in a cowshed-like garage. Her place, perhaps I should
add here, smells. Badly. It’s a miracle she’s still carrying on. As she relates
to me the rest of her sad, sorry story, there’s a question that props into my
mind. I’ll come to that later.
I was right: she
had come from a modest background. The problems for her as such began
with four dogs. Problems tend to increase. People, having heard about this
lady’s kindness towards animals, began dumping pups and kittens. They had
thought she would give them all unconditional love and attention. That’s the
way with people, after all. Drop your worries on another person’s yard. One dog
in particular, she remembers, had given birth to 10 more pups.
But this alone
wasn’t the (chief) problem. There were other issues. She had a husband. He had
died nearly two years ago. Things had been better when he was around; his
operation, which hadn’t been successful and had cost nearly two million rupees,
worsened the situation. Financial woes hadn’t ended there. She had been forced
to pawn and sell. What little had been saved in her bank was depleted, soon.
This isn’t all.
Nandani had also been victimised by a scam. A young, seemingly decent chap from
her husband’s office had wanted to borrow more than two million rupees from her
husband. Without any misgivings, he had given him the entire amount. This chap had
gone to Naples. He didn’t return the money. When Nandani went on badgering him for
it, he relented to pay 7,000 rupees every month. Even that, she tells me, isn’t
forthcoming. Naturally, she did what countless other women in her situation
would have done. She gave up.
Debts don’t
magically disappear. They continue no matter what the debt-holder’s situation
is. Natural enough. So Nandani’s debts had mounted. She had resorted to pawn
her jewellery a long time back. With the interest that accumulated, she reckons
she would have to pay more than five lakhs on them alone. They had a car. Had
been taken over, had been sold. She had borrowed more than 4,000 rupees from
neighbours; they had given her without comment, but she has since refused to
ask them for more, knowing they probably have suspected that she isn’t in a
position to meet her debts.
I ask her whether
she’s getting help from any other person. She clearly needs it. She can’t
subsist on the pittance she’s living on. Her daughter sends her money dutifully,
but that’s not enough. Indeed, she hasn’t had a proper breakfast for days. I
can sense the fatigue and worry in her eyes. She doesn’t have proper chairs,
beds, or any other furniture-item (all of them having been eaten and bitten away
by the dogs).
Others hadn’t been
so generous. There was a shop nearby that had agreed to give her some rice.
Sorry, “sell” her some rice. I looked at a sample. “Rice crumbs” would have
been a better word for the mass of flea-and-dirt-infested mess I saw. Not
surprising, because that mess was actually the rice left over every day in the
shop, swept away into a pile and unusable for any decent eating purposes.
And they had
been giving her this for 30 rupees a kilo. When she had asked the shop-vendors
whether they could reduce the price a little, they had curtly told her off by
saying that those crumbs could actually sell in the market for 40 rupees!
Nandani doesn’t
want charity. This much I can say. She needs help. Sustainable help. Temporary
assistance won’t do. Doling out money won’t do. I have come to believe that
charity is all talk and no walk; that word, after all, is among the most
misused in our dictionaries today. Charity presupposes discretion,
a choice made by the charity-giver. Nandani has had plenty of experience with
people who’ve giving help and then quickly gone away. She needs animal-lovers.
She herself tells me just how much she has grown to love her pups and kittens.
She doesn’t need
charity, to put things pithily.
I mentioned
about a question that propped into my head when I heard Nandani’s story earlier.
It’s a question Michael Moore asks us in his documentary-film Sicko.
It’s a question he asks when he explains to us how certain private hospitals in
the USA treat their patients when they can’t pay their bills anymore: by
dumping them in street-corners. It’s a question I’ve come to ask myself
whenever I see charitable organisations spit out rhetoric-bile about doing good
while conveniently ignoring the little, small-time stories of people who really,
really need (and deserve) help. A small question.
“Who are we?”
Nandani needs
help. Would Lions Club, Rotaract Club, any Interact Club, or any charity faith based
or otherwise lend a helping hand? Or would those words they (and we) keep on
harping about doing good and beginning charity at home amount to what they have
sadly become: just words?
You can
contact Nandani on 0112618969. Kindly souls, lend a hand. She’s in need of it.
Badly.
Written for: Ceylon Today LATITUDE, October 26 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment